墨尔本代写assignment_澳洲墨尔本艺术学assignment代写-乌托邦

托马斯火车·莫尔(Thomas More)的《乌托邦》(Utopia)叙述了一种理性化的公共性“乌邦托社会发展”，但它与財富驱动器的美国社会发展有共同之处。二者的共同之处注重了那样一个见解，即2个社会发展都并不是极致的，一个对每一个人都有利的社会发展是不是确实能够完成。他说明“钱是没有用的”，在丹麦哥本哈根沒有一切使用价值。有关財富的标准被颠复，由于乌邦托的目地是在中国公民中开设一个公平的规范，在这儿“一切都是公平的”，在当代日常生活被觉得有使用价值的物质主义轻视和讥讽。金子不但是財富的代表，并且具备很高的经济价值和农牧业使用价值，但因为“最灭绝人性的犯罪分子戴着黄金戒指”基本上是一种屈辱，因此黄金被觉得不是关键的。每一个人到保持小区的全过程上都奉献了自身的劳动者责任，因而，信赖被作为她们生活习惯的基本，殊不知，如果不听从奴隶制度，它便会变成一种加强。奴隶社会存有于一个极致的乌邦托全球中，这一见解说明，假如痛苦和大家遭受的“更严格的看待”沒有被废止，在随意没法造福任何人的地区，也许当代的乌邦托见解就没法真实完成。适度的处罚在于违法犯罪的水平。提及圣经十诫，“造物主严禁大家行凶”被作为社会道德规则，而不是遵照政府部门的法律法规来表明教會的必要性。天主教在16世纪是不可缺少的，具备高宽比的知名度，因此大量的斥责社会发展尝试饰演造物主的人物角色，“是啥阻拦人们应用一样的标准来决策”谁有着合理合法的权利。因而，或许大量的是对于那样一种见解，即人们沒有充足的社会道德观点来决策什么叫应受处罚的，或是一种罪刑的不正确水平，乃至很有可能乱用这类义务。因为在这个乌托邦式的社会发展中欠缺个性化，因而，乌邦托到底是友善的代表還是管束的代表，是非常值得猜疑的。尽管愈来愈多的人宣称自身是“开心的”，但她们的与世独立使她们对单独的概率一无所知。由于她们遭受执政者的危害，因此她们务必获得“批准”才可以离去这一地域，夺走了她们简易的人性的本质的公民权利。做为一个当代的阅读者，这类随意的欠缺如同一个牢房一样的社会发展，人物角色被特定，大家被限定在一个特殊的地区。这在二十一世纪是不能接纳的，并最后说明莫尔的乌邦托是简易的讥讽，目地是取笑美国的相近社会发展。

澳洲墨尔本设计学assignment代笔 乌邦托

Thomas More’s ‘Utopia’ describes a version of an idealistic communal “Utopian Society”, which however contains parallels to the wealth driven English society. The similarities between the two emphasises the idea that neither societies are perfect and whether a society beneficial for everyone is truly ever achievable.he shows that “money is of no use” and does not have any value in the city of Antwerp. Norms regarding wealth are subverted as the land of Utopia aims to set an equal standard amongst the citizens, where by “everything is equalized” and materialism which is arguably valued in modern day life, is disregarded and satirized. Gold which is not only symbolic of wealth but also has high economical and agricultural worth, is presented to be of very little importance as “the most notorious criminals wear gold rings” as almost a mark of shame. Everyone contributes to their labor duties in sustaining the community, where trust is therefore used as a foundation for their way of life, yet if disobeyed slavery becomes the reinforcement. The idea of slavery being present in a perfect Utopian world suggests that perhaps modern views of Utopia cannot really be achieved if suffering and people being “treated more harshly” is not abolished and where freedom is not available for all. appropriate punishment depending on the degree of crime. Referring to the biblical 10 Commandments, “God forbade us to kill anyone” is used as moral guidelines as opposed to following the laws of a government showing the importance of the Church. Christianity was integral and highly influential in the 16th century and so More rebukes society’s attempts to almost play God as “what is it to prevent humans from using the same principles to decide” on who is of rightful power. Therefore, perhaps More is addressing the idea that humans do not have sufficient moral standing to decide what is punishable or the degree of wrong a crime is and perhaps even abuse this responsibility. Due to the lack of individuality within this Utopian society, it is questionable as to whether Utopia is in fact a symbol of amiability or restraint. Though More claims people are “cheerful”, their seclusion makes them ignorant to the possibility of independence. It is because they are under the influence of a ruler, must they require “permission” to leave the district, denying them the simple human right of free will. As a modern day reader, this lack of freedom resembles a prison like society where roles are designated and people are confined within a specific region. This is unacceptable in the twenty-first century and ultimately suggests that More’s Utopia is simple satirical, with the purpose to mock England’s similar society.

本段內容来源于互联网 并并不是大家的网络写手著作 切勿立即抄袭，论文查重100%，导致不良影响与本网站不相干。如需订制毕业论文请还记得在线留言。