IBUS6020 Enterprise Management in China
企业管理代写 As if that is not all, private companies stifle innovation. As these firms grow due to their extensive market control, they swallow
State-owned enterprises are able to secure the competitiveness of Chinese enterprises in capital-intensive industries. Discuss. (max. 400 words)
What are the strengths and weaknesses of letting private companies such as Alibaba and Tencent develop China's fintech industry? (max. 400 words)
Such leading private companies as Alibaba and Tencent have been at the forefront of China’s fintech industry development. While these firms are crucial to the nation’s competitiveness, they also present adversarial implications. Therefore, this essay undertakes that letting private companies develop the fintech industry benefits China through foreign exchange, economic development and creation of employment, while causing problems in antitrust , stifling innovation, and infringing the interests of sellers.
First, letting private firms earn China the much-needed foreign exchange. In this regard, it is notable that Alibaba and Tencent facilitate financial transactions throughout the world. As a result, this business earns China revenue in foreign exchange. Currency exchange earned can be invested in crucial projects that benefit the entire nation. 企业管理代写
Besides, the firms create employment opportunities for Chinese youths. 企业管理代写
With one of the world’s leading populations, China is welcoming to ventures that encourage employment. It is through this reality that letting Tencent and Alibaba take charge in fintech becomes a strength. Millions of people are employed as Alibaba traders and mobile money agents, which effectively means high GDP for China that fast-track economic development.
However, a notable weakness is the involvement of these firms in antitrust conduct. As an illustration, Alibaba was fined $2.8 billion for forcing out competition by influencing vendors to choose it. As a result of this manipulation, the industry loses competitiveness, which may ultimately mean its death.
As if that is not all, private companies stifle innovation. As these firms grow due to their extensive market control, they swallow innovation and protect their copyrights and trademarks. Emerging innovators are easily bought leaving only the established firms in the industry.
Ultimately, although Alibaba and Tencent bring such strengths as creation of employment and generation of foreign exchange, they have such downsides as squeezing out rivals and killing innovation. Care must be taken to prevent these firms from harming the industry.
Discuss the broad implications of digitalization for the industry of your case company and evaluate the digitalization strategy of your case company. (max. 400 企业管理代写
Foreign invested enterprises in China should have the same market access as domestic enterprises. Discuss. (max. 400 words)
Contrary to the statement, foreign invested enterprises do not have the same market access as domestic enterprises. Unlike other nations, China presents a unique scenario in which there is a clear distinction between a domestic and a foreign invested industry. Therefore, this essay outlines such variations as laws, state intervention, and industry as impacting market access.
From the onset, it is imperative to note that China’s regulatory framework adopts a protectionist attitude towards foreign establishments. As a consequence, domestic enterprises are protected from the foreign competition. Foreign invested enterprises are, therefore, barred from accessing certain markets which gives local firms an advantage or greater access to a protected market.
Moreover, a time when the world is opening itself to China, China is closing itself to the rest of the globe. This further supports its trade protectionism approach whereby foreign firms have a more limited market access than earlier. It also means that China’s domestic enterprises have an extended market abroad as the world imports more from China. Therefore, the increased closing up of Chinese markets to firms complicates things for foreign invested entities. 企业管理代写
As if that is not all, it is noteworthy that China’s industrial and supply chains are still largely undeveloped to the standards of the world. This in itself limits the extent to which foreign invested firms can penetrate and interact with the Chinese market. As a solution, it is critical for China to upgrade these chains for foreign firms to get a chance.
In conclusion, it is not true that domestic and foreign invested firms access a similar market. State influence through protectionism, closing out the rest of the world, and undeveloped industrial and supply chains favor local firms.
Is the domestic experience of Corporate Social Responsibility of Chinese firms
transferable to their overseas operations? (max. 400 words)
Typically, nations operate under different dimensions as far as CSR goes. In this case, a comparison of China’s CSR dimensions versus western dimensions is handy. From this comparison, it is arguable that Chinese firms’ CSR experience domestically is transferable to their overseas operations. 企业管理代写
First, like the western dimension, Chinese experience is focal on environmentlal
发表回复
要发表评论，您必须先登录。