哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写 艺术代写

Name


Instructor


Course


Date


The problem of Evil and God’s Plan


哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写 Harris is an atheist who believes that children are suffering undeserving. During the discussion with professor Craig


Harris Argument

Harris is an atheist who believes that children are suffering undeserving. During the discussion with professor Craig, he was concerned that the God that Christian believes in is seeing when children are suffering. The fact that millions of children die every year before the age of 5 and every day and that parents of these children believe in him, if God were compassionate and loving, he would save these children from suffering and at least spare the believing parent the agony of losing their children. Therefore, according to Harris, if God is good, he would answer the players of his believers when they cry out calling his name and believing哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写 艺术代写 he is capable of rescuing them.哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写

In the debate with Prof. Craig, Harris concluded that if God is powerful and everywhere and can do nothing to stop catastrophic that harm children and his believers, “he doesn't care to, or he doesn’t exist. God is either impotent, evil, or imaginary” (Harris). Through this, he questioned how terrible things could happen to innocent people while religious people claim the will of God. According to Harris, it makes religious an erosion to compassion. Therefore, Harris categorized the ideas of children suffering as God’s plan to be extraordinarily callous.哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写 艺术代写

Response to Harris Argument


According to Pope in his “An Essay on Man: Epistle I,” depict evil as part of the art of nature where it is unknown when and how it can happen. Therefore, human beings can see the art of God in nature through evil and good and evil is part of the nature that God created. As such, children suffer as part of this nature as it is “all nature is but art,” which can be corrected if bad and perpetuated if good (Pope). Therefore, Harris opinion on God and his power is very subjective as he chooses to concentrate on one aspect of life whereas life is composed of good and bad.哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写 艺术代写

Work Cited

Harris, Sam. God is Either Impotent or Evil (Video). 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuPsxFklxaw&feature=youtu.be. Accessed 19 April 19, 2019.

[caption id="attachment_18294" align="alignnone" width="1920"]哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写 哲学代写 eassy代写 paper代写[/caption]

Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Man: EpistleI. Poetry Foundation. n.d. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44899/an-essay-on-man-epistle-i. Accessed 19 April 19, 2019.

哈里斯论点
哈里斯(Harris)是一位无神论者,他认为孩子正在遭受应得的痛苦。在与克雷格教授的讨论中,他担心基督徒所信仰的上帝正在看到孩子何时受苦。每年都有数百万的孩子在5岁之前每天死亡,并且这些孩子的父母都相信他,如果上帝富有同情心和爱心,他将拯救这些孩子免于痛苦,并至少避免为有信仰的父母带来痛苦。失去孩子因此,根据哈里斯的说法,如果上帝是善良的,当他们的信徒们喊叫他的名字并相信他有能力拯救他们时,他会回答他们的信徒们。
哈里斯在与克雷格教授的辩论中得出的结论是,如果上帝强大而无处不在,并且无法制止危害儿童及其信徒的灾难,“他不在乎,或者他不存在。上帝是无能的,邪恶的或虚幻的”(哈里斯)。通过这一点,他质疑无辜人民在宗教人士宣称上帝的旨意的情况下会发生多么可怕的事情。哈里斯认为,这使宗教成为同情心的侵蚀。因此,哈里斯(Harris)将儿童遭受苦难的想法归类为上帝的计划。
对哈里斯论点的回应
根据教皇在他的《论人类:书信第一书》中的描述,邪恶是自然艺术的一部分,它在何时何地如何发生是未知的。因此,人类可以通过邪恶看到自然界中上帝的艺术,善与恶是上帝创造的自然的一部分。因此,儿童受苦是这种自然的一部分,因为它是“一切自然都是艺术”,如果不好,可以纠正,如果好的话,可以永久保存(Pope)。因此,哈里斯对上帝及其力量的看法非常主观,因为他选择专注于生活的一个方面,而生活则由好与坏组成。

发表回复

客服一号:点击这里给我发消息
客服二号:点击这里给我发消息
微信客服1:essay-kathrine
微信客服2:essay-gloria