Report of the Task Force on Private Security
Name
Institution
Report of the Task Force on Private Security
经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写 According to the National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1976) the purpose was to oversee
Purpose of the Task Force Officials
According to the National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1976) the purpose was to oversee the roles and responsibilities of the private securities as they work to reduce and prevent crimes.Collaboration with the public security sectors. The task ensure adherence to standards and goals . That check operations and make sure security firms and individuals keep up with the changes in security sector. Also, the task defines the scope of the private security in law enforcement, protection services, and devices to be used in discharge of duties. Moreover, the task force also offers the criteria to be followed when hiring a private guide or training them for the job. As such, according to the task force, the criteria for hiring depends o whether the security if for private or public.经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
[caption id="attachment_18384" align="alignnone" width="800"]
经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写[/caption]
Most Significant Contribution the Report Made to The Study of Security Management Today
Through the various recommendations, the report define the scope and roles of private securities. The roles and scopes are different given that private security is meant to serve private individuals and firms will in coordination with the public security . Which offer security to the general public. In addition, it established the link on how the private and public security can work together in ensuring law enforcement. Most importantly, the task force created the standard measure and goals on which security management team is based.
Recommendations Made by the Report
The task force recommended the need for equal standard and goals to be applied uniformly in private and public security sector to promote good relationships. Both the private and public sectors should closely work together because their roles are complementally. For the purpose of good coordination of response to alarm, the report recommends installation of devices that are to the required quality and standards to ensure quality communication. For improved interaction between public and private security agencies. The question of qualification of the private security personnel should be addressed and improved. Additionally, private security powers should not be restricted only to the premises of employment hence their policing powers should go beyond that.经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
Discuss why our states and the private security profession itself might be reluctant, or even adamantly opposed to certain recommendations.
There is likelihood that state and private security professional might be opposed to some of the recommendations. The reason being, the private firms are privately funded unlike public sector and therefore. Implementation of some standards might be costly like training and standardized pay. Other areas of conflicts are trying to elevate the status of private security either by arming them or increasing the policing powers. The state security might oppose to it for fear of accountability in maintaining security. According to Private Security Monitor Report (2013). Private security sector has improved and grown over the years owing to the government support through implementation of the task force recommendations. Today, the private security is widely recognized and even acquire government security contracts.经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
Exercise 2
Various Definitions of Private Security
According to the review of definitions by Strom et al. Hallcrest I, Kakalik, and Wildhorn defined private security constitutes all types of security provided by all type of security organizational and individual. While Bottom and Kostanoki defined private security to include more than just crime but also protection against four threat which included waste, error, accidents. And unethical practices (Strom et al., 2010). The two definitions give broader perspective of defining private security.
Comparisons
Both definitions recognize the role of private security is to protect a private individuals or organizations from threats of crimes. However, the two definition are different in that Hallcrest I, Kakalik, and Wildhorn restrict their definition to private security against crimes . Criminal threats whereas Bottom and Kostanoki include protection against waste, error, accidents, and unethical practice beside crimes. The definition of Bottom and Kostanoki is broader to include foreseeing threats to private status of the organization or individual.经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
These definitions are important to the security directors as they define the scope of security plans and risk assessments. Therefore, they are bound to factor in all the security perspectives included in the definitions of the private security. However, developing security plans and risk assessment also depends on the definition of the roles and responsibilities of the security firm or individual to the client.
Additionally, to ASIS International (n.d), private security includes those that provide armed and unarmed security services to the business and individuals. Risk management involves defining, monitoring, and managing potential business risks and coming up with measures to reduce the occurrence by effecting security protection. The definition informs determining the areas of the business that are highly vulnerable to threats of crimes. In so doing, in implementing security measures, one can identify high risk and low risk section for intensive security.经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
[caption id="attachment_18361" align="alignnone" width="1920"]
经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写[/caption]
References
ASIS International. (n.d). About ASIS International. Retrieved from https://www.asisonline.org/footer-pages/about-asis/
National Advisory Commettee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. (1976). Report of the Task Force on Private Security (pp. 1-30). Warshington Dc: National Institute of Justice.
Strom, K., Berzofsky, M., Shook-Sa, B., Barrick, K., Daye, C., Horstmann, N., & Kinsey, S. (2010). The private security industry: A review of the definitions, available data sources, and paths moving forward. US Department of Justice and National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Final Report.经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
Private Security Monitor. (2013). National Regulations: United States. Retrieved from http://psm.du.edu/national_regulation/united_states/
工作队官员的目的
根据国家刑事司法标准和目标咨询委员会（1976）的目的，是要监督私人证券在与公安部门合作减少和预防犯罪时的作用和责任。该任务确保遵守检查操作的标准和目标，并确保安全公司和个人跟上安全部门的变化。此外，该任务还定义了执法，保护服务和执行职务所使用的设备中的私人保安的范围。此外，工作队还提供了聘请私人向导或对其进行培训时要遵循的标准。因此，根据工作队的说法，聘用标准取决于o安全性是针对私人还是公共的。
对当今安全管理研究所做的最重要贡献的报告
通过各种建议，报告定义了私人证券的范围和作用。鉴于私人安全是为私人服务的，而公司将与为公众提供安全的公共安全相协调，因此角色和范围是不同的。此外，它还建立了关于私人和公共安全部门如何共同协作以确保执法的链接。最重要的是，工作队制定了安全管理团队所基于的标准措施和目标。
报告提出的建议
工作队建议有必要在私营和公共安全部门统一应用平等的标准和目标，以促进良好的关系。私营部门和公共部门应密切合作，因为它们的作用是互补的。为了更好地协调警报响应，报告建议安装符合要求的质量和标准的设备，以确保通信质量。为了改善公共和私人安全机构之间的互动，应该解决和改善私人安全人员的资格问题。此外，私人保安权力不应仅局限于雇佣场所，因此其治安权力应超出此范围。
讨论为什么我们的国家和私人安全行业本身可能不愿意甚至坚决反对某些建议。
国家和私人安全专业人员可能会反对某些建议。原因是，与公共部门不同，私营公司是由私人出资的，因此，某些标准的实施可能成本很高，例如培训和标准化薪酬。冲突的其他领域正试图通过武装冲突或增强治安力量来提高私人安全的地位。国家安全可能会反对它，因为担心维护安全方面的责任感。根据《私人安全监测报告》（2013年），由于政府通过实施工作队建议而给予的支持，多年来私人安全部门得到了改善和发展。如今，私人保安已得到广泛认可，甚至获得了政府保安合同。
练习2
私人保安的各种定义
根据Strom等人对定义的审查，Hallcrest I，Kakalik和Wildhorn定义的私人安全构成了由所有类型的安全组织和个人提供的所有类型的安全，而Bottom和Kostanoki定义的私人安全不仅包括犯罪，还包括还可以抵御四种威胁，包括浪费，错误，事故和不道德的行为（Strom等，2010）。这两个定义为定义私人安全提供了更广阔的视野。经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
比较表
两种定义都承认私人安全的作用是保护私人或组织免受犯罪威胁。但是，这两个定义是不同的，因为Hallcrest I，Kakalik和Wildhorn将其定义限制为针对犯罪和刑事威胁的私人安全，而Bottom和Kostanoki则在犯罪之外提供了防止浪费，错误，事故和不道德行为的保护。 Bottom和Kostanoki的定义范围更广，包括对组织或个人私人地位的预见威胁。
这些定义对安全主管很重要，因为它们定义了安全计划和风险评估的范围。因此，它们必定会成为私有安全性定义中包含的所有安全性方面的考虑因素。但是，制定安全计划和风险评估还取决于对客户的安全公司或个人的角色和职责的定义。
此外，对于ASIS International（n.d），私人保安包括提供武装和非武装保安的保安为企业和个人提供服务。风险管理包括定义，监视和管理潜在的业务风险，并提出通过实现安全保护来减少事件发生的措施。该定义有助于确定极易受到犯罪威胁威胁的业务领域。这样，在实施安全措施时，可以识别出高风险和低风险区域以加强安全性。v经济代写 essay代写 作业代写 数学代写
References
ASIS International. (n.d). About ASIS International. Retrieved from https://www.asisonline.org/footer-pages/about-asis/
National Advisory Commettee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. (1976). Report of the Task Force on Private Security (pp. 1-30). Warshington Dc: National Institute of Justice.
Strom, K., Berzofsky, M., Shook-Sa, B., Barrick, K., Daye, C., Horstmann, N., & Kinsey, S. (2010). The private security industry: A review of the definitions, available data sources, and paths moving forward. US Department of Justice and National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Final Report.
Private Security Monitor. (2013). National Regulations: United States. Retrieved from http://psm.du.edu/national_regulation/united_states/
发表回复
要发表评论，您必须先登录。