Report of the Task Force on Private Security
犯罪心理学report代写 According to the National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1976) the purpose was to oversee the..
Report of the Task Force on Private Security犯罪心理学report代写
Purpose of the Task Force Officials
According to the National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1976) the purpose was to oversee the roles and responsibilities of the private securities as they work to reduce and prevent crimes in collaboration with the public security sectors.
The task ensure adherence to standards and goals that check operations and make sure security firms and individuals keep up with the changes in security sector. Also, the task defines the scope of the private security in law enforcement, protection services, and devices to be used in discharge of duties. Moreover,犯罪心理学report代写
the task force also offers the criteria to be followed when hiring a private guide or training them for the job. As such, according to the task force, the criteria for hiring depends o whether the security if for private or public.
Most Significant Contribution the Report Made to The Study of Security Management Today犯罪心理学report代写
Through the various recommendations, the report define the scope and roles of private securities. The roles and scopes are different given that private security is meant to serve private individuals and firms will in coordination with the public security which offer security to the general public. In addition,
it established the link on how the private and public security can work together in ensuring law enforcement. Most importantly, the task force created the standard measure and goals on which security management team is based.
Recommendations Made by the Report
The task force recommended the need for equal standard and goals to be applied uniformly in private and public security sector to promote good relationships. Both the private and public sectors should closely work together because their roles are complementally. For the purpose of good coordination of response to alarm,
the report recommends installation of devices that are to the required quality and standards to ensure quality communication. For improved interaction between public and private security agencies, the question of qualification of the private security personnel should be addressed and improved. Additionally,犯罪心理学report代写
private security powers should not be restricted only to the premises of employment hence their policing powers should go beyond that.
Discuss why our states and the private security profession itself might be reluctant, or even adamantly opposed to certain recommendations.
There is likelihood that state and private security professional might be opposed to some of the recommendations.
The reason being
the private firms are privately funded unlike public sector and therefore, implementation of some standards might be costly like training and standardized pay. Other areas of conflicts are trying to elevate the status of private security either by arming them or increasing the policing powers. The state security might oppose to it for fear of accountability in maintaining security.
According to Private Security Monitor Report (2013), private security sector has improved and grown over the years owing to the government support through implementation of the task force recommendations. Today, the private security is widely recognized and even acquire government security contracts.
Various Definitions of Private Security
According to the review of definitions by Strom et al., Hallcrest I, Kakalik, and Wildhorn defined private security constitutes all types of security provided by all type of security organizational and individual while Bottom and Kostanoki defined private security to include more than just crime but also protection against four threat which included waste, error,
accidents, and unethical practices (Strom et al., 2010). The two definitions give broader perspective of defining private security.
Both definitions recognize the role of private security is to protect a private individuals or organizations from threats of crimes. However, the two definition are different in that Hallcrest I, Kakalik, and Wildhorn restrict their definition to private security against crimes and criminal threats whereas Bottom and Kostanoki include protection against waste,犯罪心理学report代写
error, accidents, and unethical practice beside crimes. The definition of Bottom and Kostanoki is broader to include foreseeing threats to private status of the organization or individual.
These definitions are important to the security directors as they define the scope of security plans and risk assessments. Therefore, they are bound to factor in all the security perspectives included in the definitions of the private security. However, developing security plans and risk assessment also depends on the definition of the roles and responsibilities of the security firm or individual to the client.
to ASIS International (n.d), private security includes those that provide armed and unarmed security services to the business and individuals. Risk management involves defining, monitoring, and managing potential business risks and coming up with measures to reduce the occurrence by effecting security protection.
The definition informs determining the areas of the business that are highly vulnerable to threats of crimes. In so doing, in implementing security measures, one can identify high risk and low risk section for intensive security.