ARTH 7021OL Reading Review (25%)
文学论文代写 Write a summary and critical review – meaning close reading for meaning – of at least two and no more than three academic sources
Word length: 1,000 words (including footnotes and 10% leeway)
Objective 文学论文代写
Learning how to evaluate and synthesise scholarly literature develops your advanced reading comprehension and critical thinking skills . That are used to make sense of academic sources. In this context, critical does not mean negative but instead requires you to evaluate the scholarly aim, evidence, argumentation. And conclusions articulated by the author in the context of the weekly topic. A close of examination of two or more academic sources will, in turn, require you to evaluate and synthesise the content of each source comparatively by identifying similarities and anomalies in how each author explores the topic under discussion.
Instructions
Write a summary and critical review – meaning close reading for meaning – of at least two and no more than three academic sources (meaning peer-reviewed journal articles or edited book chapters) in relation to ONE of the topic clusters for weeks 4-10 to demonstrate your understanding and assessment of the key issues, ideas, arguments, and conclusions and formulate an informed opinion on the topic (one of the sources can be a Course Reading):
Week 4: Leonardo and Nature – Botany and Geology
Week 5: Leonardo and Renaissance Bodies – Studies in Anatomy
Week 6: High Renaissance Art – Leonardo’s Rivals
Week 7: Leonardo’s Patronage from Sforza Milan to the French Court – Portraiture
Week 8: On Drawing and Painting – Science and Spirituality in Leonardo’s Last Supper
Week 9: Engineering Leonardo’s World – Making Machines
Week 10: Leonardo’s Battlefield – Military Technologies
What makes an effective critical review?
An effective review will: 文学论文代写
• Convey the content of the article, the author’s approach to the topic, and their conclusions using your own words.
• Place the work in the context of other academic sources on the same or similar topics and give a sense of the article’s significance– you are encouraged to consider how the approach and conclusions in your selected article compares to the second academic source listed for the week 5 or week 6 tutorial topics.
• Avoid using dot points and instead craft a discussion using logically structured paragraphs that integrate your observations about the article’s strengths and weaknesses.
• Present a balanced evaluation that provides evidence (from within the articles) to demonstrate your observations concerning points of strength and weakness.
• Present a balanced evaluation that is respectful and honest. For example, if you find the article frustrating or difficult to understand, it is important to reflect and explain why you think this is the case in your review – is it because the author uses complicated words without providing definitions?
• Be written in a clear, concise, and engaging style of writing. While style is not an easy concept to define in writing, it basically means that the review conveys your voice and ideas as the author of the review.
Getting started
The following questions should not be used as dot points in your review, but are designed to guide and stimulate your critical thinking as you read and evaluate your selected journal articles:
• Is the writing clear, concise, and engaging or awkward and reliant on jargon – who do you think the target audience is (students, scholars, both)?
• Do the opening paragraphs give the reader an appropriate amount of background, with a clear idea of the aim and argument? 文学论文代写
• What strategy does the author use to grab the reader’s attention in the introduction to the article?
• Are the themes and arguments clearly articulated and easy to follow?
• How objective is the author’s approach to the topic, can you detect any potential bias?
• Are you convinced by the interpretations that are presented in the article?
更多代写：
发表回复
要发表评论，您必须先登录。