Stalin’s Efforts to Secure and Maintain Power from the Death of Lenin
哲学ESSAY代考 One of the strategies that Stalin adopted in his reign was the ‘Great Turn’ initiative, focusing on setting the right priorities.
The 1930s can be described as one of the longest watersheds in the narratives of Soviet history. 哲学ESSAY代考
One of the remarkable and long-lived experiences was the death of Lenin, whose contribution to the history of the Soviet was intense. He is accredited for working tirelessly to see the Soviet Union become an on-party socialist state and the governance to be maintained by the Soviet Communist Party; this was a period regarded as socialist construction. Before his death, there was confounded skeptics engaged with rapid and enthusiastic construction of dams, which led to the transformation of the villages into communal farms. Making all member of the community become genuine members of the socialist society (Siegelbaum ).
Although Lenin initiated these achievements, they were celebrated and formalized into Stalin’s constitution of 1936. According to the constitution, all the USSR people were guaranteed civil rights and equality. This paper discusses and analyzes Stalin’s efforts to secure and maintain power from the death of Lenin through the 1930s and 1940s.
After the death of Lenin, Stalin took the throne; this was the period between 1929 and 1941, a period which he describes as building Stalinism.
哲学ESSAY代考
This was a period that was characterized by various measures to secure and maintain power. There are multiple instances that Lewis Siegelbaum highlight in the race towards building the Soviet Union. One of these efforts was the implementation of the constitution in 1936. Where the union became a full-blown ‘totalitarian’ society (Constantiniu 11). The totalitarian model of Soviet politics portrayed the state as an absolute arbitrator of people’s fortunes, appreciating how various social groups, such workers and managers, collective farms, peasants on states, and non-Russians, negotiated their acceptance or resistance with the party and state officials.
One of the strategies that Stalin adopted in his reign was the ‘Great Turn’ initiative, focusing on setting the right priorities. This was deployed to solve the confusion arising from NEP policy, which sought to build socialism through capitalist practices. During this period, the state would allocate resources and assign prices according to its determined rationalities; this prevented the market mediate in relations between state-owned industry and peasant agriculture (Siegelbaum ).
As an appreciation of the power within people, millions of households producing agricultural goods on small plots, using primitive methods and inadequate machinery, were awarded support and encouraged to practice scientific farming, collective farms. Their surplus produce would be remitted as partial payment for leaded equipment. There was expansion in the industrial sector creating new jobs and expanding the size of the proletariat.
Additionally, the Stalin revolution sought to merge the discreet elements of Bolshevism.
This was a belief in the power of collective human effort in the accomplishment of tasks. The belief was cross-cutting many roles, including violence; however, Bolsheviks encouraged the new political culture to overtake the advanced capitalist countries, setting the tone for industrialization and other good deals. The emphasis on industrialization was to be deployed as a massive military campaign, which entailed mobilizations, recruitment levies, light cavalry raids against the bureaucratic practices, heroic troops of labor thrown into breaches, and victories and setbacks. This regime successfully expanded gross industrial production and increased employment, transport, and industry, surpassing the plan.
The rule of Stalin was not smooth; one of the constraints that emerged was the war against peasants. This was after Stalin launched an assault on the hinterlands, the grain-growing provinces of Ukraine and Russia, the hunting and fishing preserves of far north and Siberia, and the Steppes of Central Asia. The challenge was based on the Communist Party leadership and ambitions for social construction. After supervision of the states of the farms, Stalin organized for a collective and state farms to pump the surplus, as one of the formulas for social construction, to serve the goal of industrialization (Siegelbaum).
An important note is that the individualization was saturated with military metaphors and collectivization of the real thing, embarking on a genuine war against the peasants. The conflict triggered collectivization and resistance among the peasants, adversely affecting their lives as the civil war or even the October Revolution. Addressing the challenges with the peasants, Stalin guided party policies during the party conference in April 1929, accelerating the formation of collective farms. The state, however, did not the peasantry victory completely; instead, it brought the peasants under its administrative control through machines and made them technologically dependent.
The ruler also adopted a nation on the move presenting the ideal image of urbanization.
These are ordinary experiences, such as the construction of houses, to keep pace with the rapid population growth. Relevant when addressing the issues of food supply to meet the urban demand. This helped in the fight against famine. Apart from these changes in the industry and agriculture culture was also influential in maintaining power among the Soviets. This idea is borrowed from Lenin’s conception of the Cultural Revolution, focusing on faithfulness among the lieutenants, especially those from cultured backgrounds (Siegelbaum).
However, some several years, Stalin embarked on Communist Neo-Traditionalism, where they created a Five-Year Plan on a passion for construction. Which was changed later and replaced by a passion for mastering technology (Jowitt 275). A significant change was inevitable. Stalin encouraged changes towards adopting and training for the new technologies. He also encouraged extensive networks, the exercise of terror, and monopolistic controls, to help in sustaining the Stalinistic system.
Another act to secure and maintain power was during the Great Purges. During this time, Stalin arranged the assassination of the Leningrad party boss to do twofold. These two were killed to eliminate potential rivalry; people would also get arrested, for engaging in propaganda against the soviet state, some serving a five to eight-year crime punishment. Additionally, following the conquest of the Nazi in Germany, there were high chances that Europeans would anticipate radical shifts in foreign policies, which was a threat to the Soviet Union (Siegelbaum).
As a response and preparation, the Soviet armed forces occupied eastern Poland and the Romania province, a regime aimed at authority restoration. Stalin embarked on forced-pace industrialization techniques used during the Great Patriotic War, giving him a mighty victory. Among many other issues, focusing on socialism and technology, awarded Stalin success in maintaining the soviet state powers.
Work Cited 哲学ESSAY代考
Constantiniu, Laurenţiu. "The Security of the Soviet State: From Lenin’s Revolutionarism to Stalin’s Pragmatism." Arhivele Totalitarismului 19.3-4 (2011): 11-31.
Jowitt, Ken. "Soviet neotraditionalism: The political corruption of a Leninist regime." Soviet Studies 35.3 (1983): 275-297.
Siegelbaum, Lewis. "Building Stalinism 1929-1941." Russia: A History, edited by Gregory L (2009).a
更多代写：
发表回复
要发表评论，您必须先登录。