如何憋出一篇正儿八经的研究计划?


      要想出国留学的小宝宝,研究生也罢,博士研究生也好,起降以前免不了一篇Research Proposal,(当然,如果是course work种类的硕士研究生一般不用写RP),文中中小型编就给大伙儿共享一些工作经验。

      有关Reasearch Proposal 的普遍话题讨论

      Research Proposal体现了applicant基础的专业知识情况、科学研究创作、逻辑性剖析等诸多方面的工作能力。

      一份达标的proposal是得到grant的必备条件。



      1. 要是没有具体做了这些方面的科学研究(转专业),根据查看很多材料可否写成出类拔萃的RP?

      Of course. 根据跟踪最近的参考文献,可掌握到研究内容的现况和网络热点。

      现有的知识结构(鱼)能够给你迅速的了解难题(另一条鱼)。

      获得现有专业知识全过程初中到的逻辑性构思(渔),协助在新的专业方向上获取难题、从而解决困难。



      2. 要就某一个研究内容深层次地写,還是普遍地写一个或好多个层面?

      就一个方位深层次写。让老师见到你对课题研究的了解水平。proposal要有一定的新奇度,他人做出去的放到具体描述一部分吧。



      3. 研究目标到底是什么玩意?



      在实际研究过程中,你绝大多数的工作中是在“低头行走”,有时候“抬头看路”,而写研究目标,则是逐渐“行走”以前最重要的一次“看路”。

      科学研究新项目是依据研究目标进行实际的科学研究主题活动的,在研究过程中,很有可能会碰到出乎意料的曲折,造成 原路堵塞,只有再行他路。你要很有可能发觉新的有趣的研究内容,随后再次调节你的研究目标。因而,在运行科学研究新项目时,基本上不大可能彻底预见到研究过程中的状况。一般 ,只需沒有太偏移最开始明确的研究方案,在研究过程中开展协调能力的调节全是能够的。因此 ,针对研究目标来讲,要保证十分详尽和实际事实上是不太可能,研究目标要留有未来开展调节的室内空间。

      根据写研究目标,给你还有机会以书面通知系统软件整理你提前准备开展的科学研究主题活动,促进你思索,你科学研究的目地究竟是什么,紧紧围绕这一科学研究目地什么难题是最重要的,你准备用什么方法来处理这种难题。



      4. 研究目标的四要素

      为何这个问题关键?

      为何这个问题难以处理?

      为何如今要考虑到处理这个问题?

      为何你可以处理这个问题?

      以上内容来源于You and Your Research Proposal(You and Your Research Proposal),文中稍加简单化汇总展现。



      How to write a Reseach Proposal

      创作者:Paul T. P. Wong, Ph.D., C.Psych. (Research Director, Graduate Program in Counselling Psychology. Trinity Western University Langley, BC, Canada).



      Most students and beginning researchers do not fully understand what a research proposal means, nor do they understand its importance. To put it bluntly, one’s research is only as a good as one’s proposal. An ill-conceived proposal dooms the project even if it somehow gets through the Thesis Supervisory Committee. A high quality proposal, on the other hand, not only promises success for the project, but also impresses your Thesis Committee about your potential as a researcher.



      A research proposal is intended to convince others that you have a worthwhile research project and that you have the competence and the work-plan to complete it. Generally, a research proposal should contain all the key elements involved in the research process and include sufficient information for the readers to evaluate the proposed study.



      Regardless of your research area and the methodology you choose, all research proposals must address the following questions: What you plan to accomplish, why you want to do it and how you are going to do it.

      The proposal should have sufficient information to convince your readers that you have an important research idea, that you have a good grasp of the relevant literature and the major issues, and that your methodology is sound.

The quality of your research proposal depends not only on the quality of your proposed project, but also on the quality of your proposal writing. A good research project may run the risk of rejection simply because the proposal is poorly written. Therefore, it pays if your writing is coherent, clear and compelling.



      This paper focuses on proposal writing rather than on the development of research ideas.



      TITLE:

      It should be concise and descriptive. For example, the phrase, “An investigation of . . .” could be omitted. Often titles are stated in terms of a functional relationship, because such titles clearly indicate the independent and dependent variables. However, if possible, think of an informative but catchy title. An effective title not only pricks the reader’s interest, but also predisposes him/her favourably towards the proposal.



      ABSTRACT:

      It is a brief summary of approximately 300 words. It should include the research question, the rationale for the study, the hypothesis (if any), the method and the main findings. Descriptions of the method may include the design, procedures, the sample and any instruments that will be used.



      INTRODUCTION:

      The main purpose of the introduction is to provide the necessary background or context for your research problem. How to frame the research problem is perhaps the biggest problem in proposal writing.



      If the research problem is framed in the context of a general, rambling literature review, then the research question may appear trivial and uninteresting. 



      However, if the same question is placed in the context of a very focused and current research area, its significance will become evident.

      Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules on how to frame your research question just as there is no prescription on how to write an interesting and informative opening paragraph. A lot depends on your creativity, your ability to think clearly and the depth of your understanding of problem areas.



      However, try to place your research question in the context of either a current “hot” area, or an older area that remains viable. Secondly, you need to provide a brief but appropriate historical backdrop. Thirdly, provide the contemporary context in which your proposed research question occupies the central stage. Finally, identify “key players” and refer to the most relevant and representative publications. In short, try to paint your research question in broad brushes and at the same time bring out its significance.



      The introduction typically begins with a general statement of the problem area, with a focus on a specific research problem, to be followed by the rational or justification for the proposed study. The introduction generally covers the following elements:

      1. State the research problem, which is often referred to as the purpose of the study. 

      2. Provide the context and set the stage for your research question in such a way as to show its necessity and importance. 

      3. Present the rationale of your proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth doing.

      4. Briefly describe the major issues and sub-problems to be addressed by your research. 

      5. Identify the key independent and dependent variables of your experiment. Alternatively, specify the phenomenon you want to study. 

      6. State your hypothesis or theory, if any. For exploratory or phenomenological research, you may not have any hypotheses. (Please do not confuse the hypothesis with the statistical null hypothesis.) 

      7. Set the delimitation or boundaries of your proposed research in order to provide a clear focus. 

      8. Provide definitions of key concepts. (This is optional.)



      LITERATURE REVIEW:

      Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introduction section. However, most professors prefer a separate section, which allows a more thorough review of the literature.

      The literature review serves several important functions:

      1. Ensures that you are not “reinventing the wheel”. 

      2. Gives credits to those who have laid the groundwork for your research. 

      3. Demonstrates your knowledge of the research problem. 

      4. Demonstrates your understanding of the theoretical and research issues related to your research question. 

      5. Shows your ability to critically evaluate relevant literature information. 

      6. Indicates your ability to integrate and synthesize the existing literature. 

      7. Provides new theoretical insights or develops a new model as the conceptual framework for your research. 

      8. Convinces your reader that your proposed research will make a significant and substantial contribution to the literature (i.e., resolving an important theoretical issue or filling a major gap in the literature).

      Most students’ literature reviews suffer from the following problems:

      * Lacking organization and structure 

      * Lacking focus, unity and coherence 

      * Being repetitive and verbose 

      * Failing to cite influential papers 

      * Failing to keep up with recent developments 

      * Failing to critically evaluate cited papers 

      * Citing irrelevant or trivial references 

      * Depending too much on secondary sources



      Your scholarship and research competence will be questioned if any of the above applies to your proposal.



      There are different ways to organize your literature review. Make use of subheadings to bring order and coherence to your review. For example, having established the importance of your research area and its current state of development, you may devote several subsections on related issues as: theoretical models, measuring instruments, cross-cultural and gender differences, etc.



      It is also helpful to keep in mind that you are telling a story to an audience. Try to tell it in a stimulating and engaging manner. Do not bore them, because it may lead to rejection of your worthy proposal. (Remember: Professors and scientists are human beings too.)



      METHODS:

      The Method section is very important because it tells your Research Committee how you plan to tackle your research problem. It will provide your work plan and describe the activities necessary for the completion of your project.

      The guiding principle for writing the Method section is that it should contain sufficient information for the reader to determine whether methodology is sound. Some even argue that a good proposal should contain sufficient details for another qualified researcher to implement the study.



      You need to demonstrate your knowledge of alternative methods and make the case that your approach is the most appropriate and most valid way to address your research question.



      Please note that your research question may be best answered by qualitative research. However, since most mainstream psychologists are still biased against qualitative research, especially the phenomenological variety, you may need to justify your qualitative method.



      Furthermore, since there are no well-established and widely accepted canons in qualitative analysis, your method section needs to be more elaborate than what is required for traditional quantitative research. More importantly, the data collection process in qualitative research has a far greater impact on the results as compared to quantitative research. That is another reason for greater care in describing how you will collect and analyze your data. (How to write the Method section for qualitative research is a topic for another paper.)



      For quantitative studies, the method section typically consists of the following sections:

      1. Design -Is it a questionnaire study or a laboratory experiment? What kind of design do you choose? 

      2. Subjects or participants – Who will take part in your study ? What kind of sampling procedure do you use? 

      3. Instruments – What kind of measuring instruments or questionnaires do you use? Why do you choose them? Are they valid and reliable? 

      4. Procedure – How do you plan to carry out your study? What activities are involved? How long does it take?



      RESULTS:

      Obviously you do not have results at the proposal stage. However, you need to have some idea about what kind of data you will be collecting, and what statistical procedures will be used in order to answer your research question or test you hypothesis.



      DISCUSSION:

      It is important to convince your reader of the potential impact of your proposed research. You need to communicate a sense of enthusiasm and confidence without exaggerating the merits of your proposal. That is why you also need to mention the limitations and weaknesses of the proposed research, which may be justified by time and financial constraints as well as by the early developmental stage of your research area.

      Common Mistakes in Proposal Writing

      1. Failure to provide the proper context to frame the research question. 

      2. Failure to delimit the boundary conditions for your research. 

      3. Failure to cite landmark studies. 

      4. Failure to accurately present the theoretical and empirical contributions by other researchers. 

      5. Failure to stay focused on the research question. 

      6. Failure to develop a coherent and persuasive argument for the proposed research. 

      7. Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough detail on major issues. 

      8. Too much rambling — going “all over the map” without a clear sense of direction. (The best proposals move forward with ease and grace like a seamless river.) 

      9. Too many citation lapses and incorrect references. 

      10. Too long or too short. 

      11. Failing to follow the APA style. 

      12. Slopping writing. 



      最终,paperdaixie.com提示大伙儿要请维持一个虐死不了的强劲心里,再逐渐你的research proposal创作之行。写不到?没事儿,交到paperdaixie.com为您拿下!大家paperdaixie.com论文网善于各种各样方式的论文撰写,包含了商科专业、财务会计、金融业、统计分析、度假旅游、文化教育、人力资源管理等众多学术研究行业,技术专业出示留学人员作业代写服务项目有较长的历史时间,不论是在辩论技巧毕业论文、专题论文、综述论文等论文代写有比较丰富的工作经验。paperdaixie.com可能用尽职尽责的心态为您出示高质量的毕业论文和高品质的服务项目!必须留学人员作业代写服务项目请咨询客服QQ:800056654

发表评论

客服一号:点击这里给我发消息
客服二号:点击这里给我发消息
微信客服1:cxj17623630232
微信客服2:Sleeboy
微信客服3:Badgeniuscs
微信客服4:Sboylee